July 3, 2008 Lathrop-Manteca,CA

Forum Login

Latest Forum Posts

None

The future of downtown

Written by Sarah Ostman Thursday, 15 May 2008

Image 

Sun Post photo

LOOKING FORWARD: A group of downtown Manteca merchants will ask the City Council this summer to make some changes downtown. Recommendations on their list range from tearing out medians to tearing out — well, just about everything.

MANTECA — Fighting to stay viable in a world of Targets and Best Buys, independent merchants will soon ask local lawmakers to start making some changes downtown — including one controversial proposal that could eventually see much of historic Manteca demolished.

The Downtown Subcommittee of the Manteca Assessment Task Force has been meeting for nearly a year with city officials and folks from the Manteca Convention and Visitors Bureau, brainstorming ways to bring more shoppers to the streets surrounding North Main Street and West Yosemite Avenue.

Their recommendations, which will be presented to the City Council in July, include four relatively minor traffic fixes and one controversial long-term plan to bulldoze and rebuild large portions of downtown.

In the short term, members want the council to jackhammer out the bulb-outs and medians installed several years ago along Main Street and Yosemite Avenue. Business owners argue that the additions, meant to beautify, have only succeeded in stalling traffic and keeping customers away.

”How many people do you run into in a day that say, ‘I hate going downtown, it’s such a pain?’”     Brenda Franklin, committee chair and owner of Tipton’s Stationery and Gifts, asked the committee May 7. “It doesn’t matter what you have on the shelf if you can’t get to it.”

The committee also wants the flow of traffic reversed on one-way Maple Avenue; new surfaces and striping in public parking lots; and city maintenance of downtown alleys.

But councilmen must conduct a traffic study before any of these changes can be made, said Deputy City Manager John Nowak, who has been sitting in on the committee meetings. Nowak said he was unsure how much that traffic study would cost.

The committee also voted in April to add one controversial long-term recommendation to their list — a proposal that the city buy and demolish large chunks of downtown for redevelopment, preserving only the most important historical sites.

Sun Post co-publisher and former Manteca mayor Carlon Perry, who proposed the idea, suggested the city could then give tax incentives to developers who would rebuild a more pedestrian-friendly center.

“The concept isn’t 10 or 20 years, it’s 30, 40, 50 years,” Perry said. “If they don’t make some major changes in the downtown, the downtown will not be a viable commercial center because of all the other shopping areas that they’re developing.”

Last summer, tourism expert Roger Brooks, who was hired by the Convention and Visitors Bureau to explore Manteca’s tourism potential, showed city leaders examples of cities that had completely renovated their downtowns.

The process is often slow, Brooks said in his presentation, and ofteninvolves cities selecting themes and handpicking businesses that may set up shop downtown.

But in Manteca, the severity of the idea has caused some apprehension;
a month after their April vote, some committee members were having second thoughts, citing concerns over lost revenue and public perception.

“It’s great to say, ‘OK, bulldoze everything.’ But it’s not coming back in two days,” Franklin said at the group's May 7 meeting. “By then (your customers) have found somewhere else to buy.”

The recommendation would have to be approved by a majority of the council and would have to undergo significant studies before any action could be taken, Nowak said.

Mayor Willie Weatherford and Convention and Visitors Bureau director Linda Abeldt did not return phone calls seeking comment on the issue.

The downtown committee will continues its discussions at future meetings.

Comments (2)add
...
written by EJ Parra , May 19, 2008
Doing anything in old, decaying downtowns with public money is a waste of time and political pandering. This will be yet another effort that won't work until the business owners clean up the front and back of their establishments and stay open at night when people are off work and can go shopping. Most families have two-earners, so there very few stay at home moms to do the shopping during the day. The government can't bail you out for bad business practices, nor can the tax-payer continue to afford to do it.
...
written by gator , May 22, 2008
I agree with Mr.Parra's reluctance to see peoples taxes used for private interest.We already have a debt exceeding 300 million dollars spent on private enterprise.This would be the redevelopment debt the city has incurred. Some people think the taxpayers money should be confiscated by
the rogue organization called the RDA Agency, to finance redevelopment of
private businesses.Business owners in the old city would probably welcome
the tax payers money to buy out deteriating buildings and get out from under having to renovate and retrofit the existing buildings down town.
A suggestion was made to give incentives to developers, to redevelop the town area. It is my opinion we have given developers enough money in incentives. I firmly believe we are in a recession. I believe Mr.Pinkerton
our new City Manager made it very clear, that we need to cut costs and go into a conservative spending mode. I also hope this includes focusing on
paying down our huge deficit the council has ran up in RDA usage.It's time for the council to go lean and mean in spending.Some would suggest that we
run the RDA debt up even higher. This would mean the council would float
another 20 million dollar bond to pay down the interest.The irony is, the
RDA agency doesn't need our vote to float bonds on us.I also think we should get out of the business of holding on to large plots of land in
Manteca that the city owns. The city is setting on millions of dollars in
land and businesses they can't develope, because of lack of funding.New business coming to the area has sapped us dry for funding needed for a
new library.The council has given millions of dollars to businesses in incentives. They have given sales tax reductions in the millions to retail businesses. This has robbed the schools of their share of business increment taxes.

Their are people who want the city to take more of the school money and
give it to developers, while some teachers are gettin laid off, that have
dedicated most of their lives in educating kids. The current RDA debt is
300 million dollars and the schools were entitled to 33% of that amount.
That means the schools were robbed of 100.65 million dollars their share.
The RDA agency is allowed by the state to retain 72% of the business increment taxes that support our schools,public safety and the general and
emergency fund. The school board should seek to amend this 72% to exclude
the 33% from this confiscation of their support taxes.Better yet, petition
the state to shut the Redevelopment Agency down.The Governor being of weak
mind and no backbone refuses to address this huge drain on our vital taxes.
I have pounded his desk many times in protest to this drain of our taxes to
make the rich, richer.This agency is setting the stage in spending, that will soon cause more taxation for schools and public safety.Folks with gas
and food prices rising rapidly and people losing their homes we can ill afford this drain on our taxes. The council doesn't seem to give a damn about the erosion of our fixed incomes, brought about by their spending.
This council gives millions away to big box and they want even think about
seniors in Mobile parks that need rent control.There are councilmen who
want's to continue developent in this city, using the tax giveaway process.
If this is allowed to continue, look out for premature taxation on the public. If the merchant's downtown want change, then let them finance it.
they have been rent gouging merchants for years in the area.Some businesses
are ran out by high rents and lack of buisness.The council is responsible
for this delemma somewhat, by not renovating the town, prior to installing
malls that sap the life out of the old city.This is the story that existes
through-out this country today.
You must be logged in to comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.
busy